What's new

Tim Resigns

Bacon Farmer

Top Contributor
And the scumbags can't resist verballing him on the way out. Note the lack of information about it being admitting FOREIGN EMPLOYEES of SUPPLY SIDE MEMBERS:

"Mr Connell, a demand class Director since 2016, said he did not support the Board’s majority position of admitting new members in line with the auDA Constitution and the requirements of the federal government review."
 

PaulS

Regular Member
Well done Tim.
Yours was an eloquent and pointed resignation letter.
You served the Board and Demand members at the worst / hardest possible time of any over the last 18 years.
Your effort is massively appreciated and I hope that once the scars heal, you will continue to contribute.
 

DomainNames

Top Contributor
Hi Tim,

While it is disappointing there will be no actual elected Demand Class Members on the auDA Board you seem to have made the right choice while others have not... The laughable thing is auDA has said the remaining auDA Board signed off on the 955 stacked members and you did not! Well good move for you and a costly mistake for them which will follow them for years to come even after they leave auDA.

The mass sign up of Supply staff into demand class voting memberships and the majority of them being non Australians based overseas, the bulk using the same Supply employer contact email address and same Supply employer P.O. Box is a very serious issue...It appears this blatant vote stacking was perhaps done under the nose of auDA Management and some auDA Board Directors directly...( More to come on that later....but it has been widely reported already).

The majority of the vote at the SGM voted to remove the Chair and 2 Directors.. https://www.itwire.com/open-sauce/83810-auda-voting-system-is-skewed-to-favour-management.html yet they spun it claiming some false victory... Well guess what watch this space..as the Commonwealth Government is now in receipt of some very interesting information it will be hard to ignore regarding Voting, memberships and more from numerous experts!

The current auDA Management and Board have completely ruined the reputation of auDA, Destabilised it and ALL 29 points from the Government report state current auDA Management are the problem..they are NOT the solution as they stubbornly continue to spend vast sums of auDA funds trying to spin why they should remain.

I think No existing Board member, the CEO or even perhaps some others will be with auDA in the next years time. What damage have they done and what will it cost our of auDA Funds and to the .au namespace before they leave?

No matter how much auDA Management and Board are paying for PR spin and tactics there is no covering up the vast amount of evidence which proves the current auDA Management and Board remain "Not Fot For Purpose"
"Potential for board stacking
· There were claims the Constitution allowed for ‘board stacking’ and was potentially open to abuse given there is no restriction under the Constitution to prevent members to move from one class to another."

"Roles and responsibilities of the Board, Chair and management
The Review considers that clear guidance on the role of the Board and executive management team supports effective governance. However, there is limited information on the roles and responsibilities of the Board and management. For example, while auDA’s Constitution does outline the structure of auDA’s Board, it makes no mention of the respective roles of the Board, Chair or CEO."

"Clarity on the roles and responsibilities of the Board, both individually and collectively, is important as it sets expectations for the directors and also provides clarity around the internal governance of the company."

"in terms of transparency of internal governance, the Review also finds that there were no public documents outlining the role of the CEO. It was unclear as to the limitations of the CEO and how the position functioned alongside the Board. While the role and responsibilities of the CEO should be clarified, the Review also considers that the functions of this position should be reviewed, including the standards by which the CEO’s performance is assessed.

... The Charter should also describe the basis for appointment of the Chair position.

The Review considers that a Board Charter should be established to articulate the roles of the Board, the Chair and the CEO. In terms of transparency and accountability, the Review further considers that auDA should report annually and publicly to its stakeholders on the Board’s performance against the requirements of this charter. This would enable the Board to also assess the effectiveness of its Board Charter annually."

"Submissions highlighted that transparency and consultation are areas on which auDA should improve.[1] Some submissions and stakeholders noted that auDA had not effectively consulted its stakeholders on significant projects, such as the Registry Transformation Project and Direct Registration. While these projects are outside the scope of this Review, the concerns raised in submissions underscore the importance of effective consultation."

"The issue of Board stacking is of particular concern. This would suggest a manipulation of process to place directors on the Board to act in the interest of a particular membership faction."

"Stakeholders consistently stated that additional assurances are required to prevent the stacking of the Board and to ensure Board members are suitably qualified and sufficiently representative of the industry and its stakeholders."

"That auDA establish a Board Charter:
a. to set out the respective roles and responsibilities of the Board, Chair and CEO
b. to set out the basis for appointment of the Chair
c. that requires the Board to report on an annual basis to stakeholders publicly on its performance against this charter."

 

Attachments

  • ACCC and Government auDA Concerns Supply members.pdf
    971.4 KB · Views: 2

DomainNames

Top Contributor
hi
yes, that day has now come, thanks everyone for your support.
https://www.timconnell.com.au/tim-connell.pdf

tim

Great letter Tim
  • No B.S.
  • Exposes the issues and methods everyone has suspected auDA Management and other Board members have been up to.
  • Undeniable evidence something is seriously wrong with current auDA Management and current remaining Board members and that they remain "Not Fit For Purpose" like the Government review and report stated clearly.
  • Evidence from inside auDA the stacking and questionable SGM vote counting methods are real issue's which current auDA Management and Board are willingly signing off on. I expect we will see something escalating on this very shortly....
It appears if experts are correct that some other remaining Directors perhaps should not even qualify or remain as Directors currently...Perhaps their member and board votes over time are invalid.... Let's see when this comes to light...
 
Last edited:

Community sponsors

Domain Parking Manager

AddMe Reputation Management

Digital Marketing Experts

Catch Expired Domains

Web Hosting

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
11,099
Messages
92,050
Members
2,394
Latest member
Spacemo
Top