http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/17/2929329.htm
Read the comments. Unfortunately they are closed but yet again display terrible ignorance by the Aussie public....
It appears the previous owner was a legitimate tourism business in the NT with a full website going back at least 10 years. Doesn't stop the cybersquatter tag being thrown about by these ignorant fools.
Gems like:
Read the comments. Unfortunately they are closed but yet again display terrible ignorance by the Aussie public....
It appears the previous owner was a legitimate tourism business in the NT with a full website going back at least 10 years. Doesn't stop the cybersquatter tag being thrown about by these ignorant fools.
Gems like:
(the poor previous owner has been running a website to support his legitimate tourism business for over 10 years - he's not even a domainer)this is a current legal type of extortion. There is land everywhere, yet there is only one trading domain name. Free enterprise, clever greedy tech heads or unempathetic vulchures? You decide....
(ICANN arbitrate disputes do they?)For about $1,000 a dispute over a claim for these domain names could have been arbitrated by ICANN with a good chance of success. The NT government was irresponsible to pay this amount of money as an effective ransom.
(Yes, we all know auda encourages domain name piracy!)The federal government has openly encouraged domain name piracy, or "cybersquatting" in Australia, by the creation of auda, the body which actively encourages domain name piracy, wher people hijack domain names to which they are not entitled, and hold the domain names for ransom.