DomainNames
Top Contributor
Changes we need
1. no need for abn or any other requirements etc. ( Its not needed in most other domain name extensions so why do we still have it?
2. reverse domain name highjacking stopped and the $5000 fine imposed as they do in Canada - example http://www.domainnamenews.com/cctld...lty-ca-reverse-domain-hijacking-decision/4905
$5000 to defendant policy http://cira.ca/assets/Documents/CDRPpolicy.pdf
4.6 Bad Faith of Complainant. If the Registrant is successful, and the Registrant
proves, on a balance of probabilities, that the Complaint was commenced by the
Complainant for the purpose of attempting, unfairly and without colour of right, to cancel
or obtain a transfer of any Registration which is the subject of the Proceeding, then the
Panel may order the Complainant to pay to the Provider in trust for the Registrant an
amount of up to five thousand dollars ($5000) to defray the costs incurred by the
Registrant in preparing for, and filing material in the Proceeding. The Complainant will
be ineligible to file another Complaint in respect of any Registration with any Provider
until the amount owing is paid in full to the Provider.
3. No new extensions such as .au ( without the .com.au) There are many domain name registrars /resellers ( and possibly some inside auda ?) pushing for the new .au extension so they can again reap millions in new registrations. To have a new extension will create chaos for those who have invested in their online branding. Example if they go and release seek.au mycareer.au realestate.au travel.au etc etc can you imagine the chaos? Only people who will benefit are auda, Lawyers and the domain name registrars want to sell the same names again under more extensions
4. Increase the fee for lodging domain disputes. make it $5000 to lodge a dispute and allow the defendant to request a 3 person panel at no cost to them.
1. no need for abn or any other requirements etc. ( Its not needed in most other domain name extensions so why do we still have it?
2. reverse domain name highjacking stopped and the $5000 fine imposed as they do in Canada - example http://www.domainnamenews.com/cctld...lty-ca-reverse-domain-hijacking-decision/4905
$5000 to defendant policy http://cira.ca/assets/Documents/CDRPpolicy.pdf
4.6 Bad Faith of Complainant. If the Registrant is successful, and the Registrant
proves, on a balance of probabilities, that the Complaint was commenced by the
Complainant for the purpose of attempting, unfairly and without colour of right, to cancel
or obtain a transfer of any Registration which is the subject of the Proceeding, then the
Panel may order the Complainant to pay to the Provider in trust for the Registrant an
amount of up to five thousand dollars ($5000) to defray the costs incurred by the
Registrant in preparing for, and filing material in the Proceeding. The Complainant will
be ineligible to file another Complaint in respect of any Registration with any Provider
until the amount owing is paid in full to the Provider.
3. No new extensions such as .au ( without the .com.au) There are many domain name registrars /resellers ( and possibly some inside auda ?) pushing for the new .au extension so they can again reap millions in new registrations. To have a new extension will create chaos for those who have invested in their online branding. Example if they go and release seek.au mycareer.au realestate.au travel.au etc etc can you imagine the chaos? Only people who will benefit are auda, Lawyers and the domain name registrars want to sell the same names again under more extensions
4. Increase the fee for lodging domain disputes. make it $5000 to lodge a dispute and allow the defendant to request a 3 person panel at no cost to them.
Last edited: