chris
Top Contributor
Something for the network geeks.
I saw this discussed today on a tech list and it brings up some interesting issues. I personally use a few internal extensions (once common practice) and even though I'm not using anything currently listed as a proposed gTLD, it's definitely changed the way I think about naming conventions.
http://gcn.com/blogs/cybereye/2013/07/new-domain-names-bound-for-collisions.aspx
http://www.darkreading.com/advanced-threats/generic-tlds-threaten-name-collisions-in/240158075
There's also the security aspect, a topic for another time.
Cheers,
Chris
I saw this discussed today on a tech list and it brings up some interesting issues. I personally use a few internal extensions (once common practice) and even though I'm not using anything currently listed as a proposed gTLD, it's definitely changed the way I think about naming conventions.
http://gcn.com/blogs/cybereye/2013/07/new-domain-names-bound-for-collisions.aspx
http://www.darkreading.com/advanced-threats/generic-tlds-threaten-name-collisions-in/240158075
There's also the security aspect, a topic for another time.
Cheers,
Chris
