auDA EGM

[Bacon Farmer]

So all Afilias employees whom are auDA members had their personalised link for electronic voting sent via the one email address and they were distributed by lists?

So anybody at Afilias could have used someone elses personalised link for voting?

Can we get some confirmation this didn't happen?

And would distributing personal emails by internal lists be a breach of those employees privacy?

 

[DomainNames]

Wake up people... This has all been rigged.

273 Supply staff from overseas with same generic company email address? How did they all vote with a proxy?

 

[ttfan]

So what were the vote numbers?

 

[Bacon Farmer]

Something like 300 supply side employees for the change, 10 legitimate demand members against and 150 other demand members couldn't be stuffed voting against the stack.

 

[findtim]

hmm, @ 600+ enthusiastic new members just a few months into membership decided not to vote on such important issues?

 

[Bacon Farmer]

And the ones that shared a single email address did.

 

[DomainNames]

hmm, @ 600+ enthusiastic new members just a few months into membership decided not to vote on such important issues?

What a big mistake by using the same 3 company email addresses as their same membership contact detail and no one really uses that set up email to notice it or work out how to orchestrate the voting via it individually in time.