Hello elbranch
thankyou for your indepth explanation on the restricted use of the word university. I did not know that.
I was under the impression that a trademark had to be for the exact word - variations such as plural & singular can change the name and would fall outside of that trademark? do you think?
There is no specific legislation dealing with the precise issue of 'singular' and 'plural' trade marks instead this is covered by terms such as 'deceptively similar' and 'not capable of distinguishing'.
Here are two examples.
*****************************************
TRADE MARKS ACT 1995 - SECT 10
Definition of deceptively similar
For the purposes of this Act, a trade mark is taken to be deceptively similar to another trade mark if it so nearly resembles that other trade mark that it is likely to deceive or cause confusion.
*****************************************
****************************************
TRADE MARKS ACT 1995 - SECT 41
Trade mark not distinguishing applicant's goods or services
(1) An application for the registration of a trade mark must be rejected if the trade mark is not capable of distinguishing the applicant's goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is sought to be registered (the designated goods or services ) from the goods or services of other persons.
Note: For goods of a person and services of a person see section 6.
(2) A trade mark is taken not to be capable of distinguishing the designated goods or services from the goods or services of other persons only if either subsection (3) or (4) applies to the trade mark.
(3) This subsection applies to a trade mark if:
(a) the trade mark is not to any extent inherently adapted to distinguish the designated goods or services from the goods or services of other persons;
*****************************************
In your case you would have absolutely no hope at all of defending a claim brought against you by Open Universities Australia. For the purposes of the Trade Marks Act, Open University Australia would be considered as good as the same as Open Universities Australia.
The restriction on the use of the word 'university' is entirely separate from trade mark law and separate from any claim another entity might have over the domain name according to trade mark law.
The issue with the restriction of the use of the word 'university' is that to a certain extent it is determined arbitrarily, it can depend on how the examiner 'feels' about the application and the use of the word. In general you can explain how you intend to use the word 'university' to abide by the policy and it will be accepted.
In your case I think this is unlikely because even if you intend to abide by the policy the examiner will reject your application because of the arbitrary determination that it seems to infringe on the rights of the Open Universities Australia entity, an entity which already has a relationship with the examining body. The policy itself does not state this as a reason for rejection but because the policy is applied arbitrarily then I believe it would be more than likely (over 50% chance) that it would be rejected for the reason I have outlined.
For the purposes of this policy (not the Trade Marks Act), the words 'university' and 'universities' are considered to be the same in the way they are covered by the policy.
This discussion about whether your domain name would be accepted according to the policy is however rather academic because it would have absolutely no hope of surviving a claim by Open Universities Australia if it was in fact accepted according to the policy.
You should also note that as there is no specific legislation relating to the use of singular and plural trade marks it is theoretically possible to have separate registrations/uses for the singular and plural if other parts of the legislation are not breached. However this is highly unlikely and in your case not applicable because your domain name is very clearly a trade mark infringement.