Bacon Farmer
Top Contributor
Members would have received an email with a link to the report. See below:
https://auda.org.au/assets/Policies/auDA-Policy-Review-Panel-Interim-Report-15-May-2015.pdf
Apparently the PRP thought putting up a 'straw person' model up at the public consultations back in February was a good idea.
I'll never trust anything the PRP says again.
"The Panel looks forward to continuing its dialogue with the Australian public during the future consultation process, as detailed below."
I look forward to treating the PRP with the same disrespect.
Denigrating the vast bulk of anti direct registrations submissions as short on evidence and therefore of not much consequence is pretty disappointing to say the least. It's just more auDA pushing it's own agenda and disregarding anything to the contrary.
https://auda.org.au/assets/Policies/auDA-Policy-Review-Panel-Interim-Report-15-May-2015.pdf
Apparently the PRP thought putting up a 'straw person' model up at the public consultations back in February was a good idea.
I'll never trust anything the PRP says again.
"The Panel looks forward to continuing its dialogue with the Australian public during the future consultation process, as detailed below."
I look forward to treating the PRP with the same disrespect.
Denigrating the vast bulk of anti direct registrations submissions as short on evidence and therefore of not much consequence is pretty disappointing to say the least. It's just more auDA pushing it's own agenda and disregarding anything to the contrary.