A silent release? http://www.netfleet.com.au/keywords
New NetFleet feature
- Thread starter Nova
- Start date
Wow Nova you're on the ball - I'm glad you like it! Just made the feature public about an hour before your post and yet to do an announcemnet.
Will probably be some bugs and improvements so please sing out. Not sure what you mean by the last question - there is a daily option??
Will probably be some bugs and improvements so please sing out. Not sure what you mean by the last question - there is a daily option??
I was after a feature whereby any domain added to the standard listings on the previous day was then emailed the following day. Basically just replacing the need to visit the "Added <7 Days Ago" listing.
I know there are RSS however I prefer emails
Mark
Top Contributor
I was after a feature whereby any domain added to the standard listings on the previous day was then emailed the following day. Basically just replacing the need to visit the "Added <7 Days Ago" listing.
I know there are RSS however I prefer emails
I've updated the tool to include this. You just need to enter the following keyword:
GREEDYME
And it will include all. Also added a keyword suggestion tool, which may or may not be useful! Lastly, the URL has changed:
http://www.netfleet.com.au/alerts
Bacon Farmer
Top Contributor
Nice feature guys, thanks.
Lemon
Top Contributor
Great new feature.
Can someone explain how the Netfleet quality ranking works because it seems a bit hit and miss. There are a few quality domains with low rankings like gossip.com.au 72 and other dodgy names like hotelin.com.au with a ranking of 100. To me it gives the impression that a lower quality name is worth less which can hinder sales. Any chance of either using a better algorithm or ditching it entirely.
lemon
Can someone explain how the Netfleet quality ranking works because it seems a bit hit and miss. There are a few quality domains with low rankings like gossip.com.au 72 and other dodgy names like hotelin.com.au with a ranking of 100. To me it gives the impression that a lower quality name is worth less which can hinder sales. Any chance of either using a better algorithm or ditching it entirely.
lemon
Honan
Top Contributor
I believe it is the quality of the listing, not the quality of the domain
Yes that's it Joe.
In this example hotel in.com.au is rewarded by having such an aggressive target price and gossip would do a lot better if the target price were lower.
Its probably a bit rough on gossip because gossip does have some great brand able value which is hard to gauge through metrics. Hotel in has great phrase match which is making our system feel it's an absolute bargain at 200
In this example hotel in.com.au is rewarded by having such an aggressive target price and gossip would do a lot better if the target price were lower.
Its probably a bit rough on gossip because gossip does have some great brand able value which is hard to gauge through metrics. Hotel in has great phrase match which is making our system feel it's an absolute bargain at 200
Data Glasses
Top Contributor
As discussed before the quality of the listing is a misleading number that should not exist next to the domain listing , it only fools people into thinking names a higher quality, when in fact they are now
it is unfortunately a major and highly visible flaw in an otherwise great service
i have looked up names in the past only to find the 'direct match' has a quality rating of 50% ................wtf , for a direct match
it is unfortunately a major and highly visible flaw in an otherwise great service
i have looked up names in the past only to find the 'direct match' has a quality rating of 50% ................wtf , for a direct match
Data Glasses
Top Contributor
should be when they are in fact not .................please fix the editing feature
I fully agree. Despite the intention, it's very misleading IMO.
Community sponsors
Members online
No members online now.
