1. Welcome to DNTrade. If you want to find out about the latest domain name industry news or talk, share, learn, buy, sell, trade or develop domain names - then you've come to the right place. It's a diverse and active community, with domain investors, web developers and online marketers - and it's free! Click here to join now.
    Dismiss Notice

Election Statement Thread

Discussion in 'General Domain Discussion' started by DnEbook, Nov 7, 2016.

  1. DnEbook

    DnEbook Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    741
    Can the nominees please state where they stand on the following in order of categories
    ~
    Implementation of .au ..Yes or No
    Time frame ..... How long
    Rights to .Au ......who should get first rights
    Domain renewals .......length options, how many years
    ~
    Abn requirement ...... should Joe Blow be able to have a .com.au without needing an Abn
    Obligation to monetise should Joe Blow have to monetise his blog
    ~
    .net.au pricing (if no rights to .au should this be cheaper) Seems .net.au owners pay the same for reg but may get less rights
    ~
    I am not asking for anyone elses opinions, just a response from the candidate, if a candidates wishes to add another category to their response I am cool with that, sorry but I am getting lost in all the posts and feel it may be a bit more straight forwards to simply list your intentions here, If I am contacted by candidates outside the forum I may send them here offering the option to also state their views for all to see. Regards
    ~
    I have already responded to one candidates email and stated we are all adults and all viewpoints are fully respected. I have given them to link this thread and stated I wish to see viewpoints on an open platform
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2016
  2. Shane

    Shane Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    680
    auDA Member:
    Yes
    No.

    I've had a consistent stance on this since the beginning. I like the idea of a shorter domain, however I don't believe they are necessary and I am against their introduction on the basis that they will burden SMEs with additional costs and unnecessary work for no real benefit.

    Furthermore, I believe the addition of another option will simply cause confusion amongst business owners and the general public.

    com.au is strong. The reasons given by the 'for' side do not justify weakening it.

    If implementation goes ahead, I would like to see existing holders given up to 5 years without fearing that someone else will take their domain.

    com.au holders first.

    Make it consistent with .com - 1 to 10 years. I'd like to be able to lock in my business domains for 10 years, whilst some of my 'project' domains may only be worth a 1 year registration. Give the people choice.

    Whilst I do believe the ABN requirement helped to make the .com.au space as strong and as trusted as it is today, I don't believe it is still required today.

    As we have seen, plenty of scammers are getting around the requirement, so lets thank it for its efforts and move on.

    Whilst on the subject, one of the arguments for introducing direct registrations is to help fuel growth in the AU space. Could removing the ABN requirement not provide a boost on its own without affecting existing holders?

    Restricting the eligibility of people to register com.au domains is forcing many private website owners to use non-AU extensions.

    Nope. Get rid of it.

    Consistent pricing across the board.

    Thanks Rod.
     
  3. findtim

    findtim Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    7,301
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    auDA Member:
    Yes
    No, nobody has given me any good reason for its implementation other then "its shorter" ! hardly something to base such an australia wide expense on.
    the real cost go much further then just registration, signage, rebranding, backlinks, consumer education.
    the UK and NZ haven't done it successfully so why are we trying to use their models?
    5-10yrs , i am still for we only need 1 and not 2, so if we "need" it then lets go all the way.
    .com.au has all the rights, mosttttttttttt .net.au regos happen because the .com.au is taken so they should not be treated equal
    as proposed, 1-5/10 yrs, it makes sense first, if you don't like it you don't have to do it, 1 off events benefit, long term security benefits, win win win
    i am hesitant, that might produce a landrush of trouble making scammers that auda can't keep up with, misspells etc, whereas joe blow is currently having to use .com or other so it would be good for them.
    so i lean on the side of no abn and hope it doesn't blow up in joe blows face.
    this all round is a stupid rule imo, it served its purpose to easeeeeeee us into reality so lets drop it.
    auda can set the wholesale but resellers set the retail, i think .net.au should cost less retail.

    thanks rod, hopefully others will post
    tim,
     
    chris and DomainNames like this.
  4. Jimboot

    Jimboot Membership: Community

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    5
    I'm late to the fight as this was not on my radar at all.
    No. This it's a terrible idea. A useless cost to business and devaluation of existing assets.
    Never.
    Awesome question that highlights just one reason why this is a bad idea. Does a .org.au or .com.au have more rights?
    This is such a bad idea I find it difficult to answer some of these questions. Just don't do it.
    no. It's not broken. Let's not try to fix it.
    no.
    Cheaper as there is less demand.
    I video blogged about this today. http://stewartmedia.com.au/direct-au-registrations-a-new-australian-internet-tax/
     
    chris, DomainNames and Bacon Farmer like this.
  5. chris

    chris Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    815
    auDA Member:
    Yes
    findtim likes this.
  6. Nicole Murdoch

    Nicole Murdoch Membership: Community

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2016
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    45
     
    DnEbook and DomainNames like this.
  7. Nicole Murdoch

    Nicole Murdoch Membership: Community

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2016
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    45
    My statement:

    I am Nicole Murdoch, and I’m running for election as a Director (Demand Class) of the auDA.

    My reasons for running for election as Director of auDA are very simple. I was part of the 2015 auDA names policy panel, as part of that process I became interested in the decision making process of auDA and wanted to take part in that process and in auDA.

    As most of you would know, the 2015 names policy panel members were appointed to discuss and comment on certain topics and one of those topics was whether domains at the .au should be open to registration. As the year progressed I became interested in why the questions posed to the panel were posed in the manner that they were (ie: in isolation) and I wanted to know why.

    I was also interested in how auDA sought feedback from the Australian community at large regarding opening .au for registration.

    My personal feelings on the topic is that we cannot answer the question of whether .au should be opened up without considering how it should be opened up and what the “rules of play” would be. To consider the question properly we needed to be able to consider the advantages and disadvantages of opening up .au for registration, and to consider those we needed to know the “rules of play”. I would have also preferred to see a more comprehensive community consultation than what was conducted.

    From that process and considering what I observed from that process I made a conscious decision that I wanted to be part of the decision making processes at auDA rather than be an outsider questioning why certain decisions are made. I want to be part of the process of deciding how the .au release is implemented.

    I am keen to increase the membership of auDA and the involvement of the community. Even if people are not members of auDA the community as a whole should have a say in how the domain space is administered. Ultimately it is a public good and is a critical infrastructure. As such it needs to properly serve the people.

    My background is varied but I am qualified for the task. I have a technical background and learnt to program 31 years ago (don’t do the maths) when my father brought home an Apple IIE. I eventually became a programmer and the first website I built was built in 1998 for my mother’s business. From there I moved onto larger projects coding in PHP, HTML, C/C++, JAVA and SQL (Oracle and MYSQL) including working on the E*Trade (German) website and other e-commerce sites. I have worked as a website developer and worked in SEO.

    I am now working as an Intellectual Property lawyer. I have served as a director in other companies and that background (and legal training) gives me some advantage in terms of corporate governance.

    Because I am a lawyer and work in trade mark dispute matters, I am often accused of being anti-monetisation. That is simply not correct. I represent clients who are rights holders as well as clients who simply want to openly trade without intimidation from trade mark holders. I am keen to have the .au domain space used by the community and believe in monetisation of domains. But, yes, I say that there does need to be some fair “rules of play” involved.

    My job gives me an interesting perspective on how day to day traders see the internet and the domain space. I see both sides of the debate on a daily basis. I am often told that it is “not fair” that other traders have a domain name my client wants. Then I see traders make massive investments in their domain holdings, not only to develop their websites but also to drive traffic to the domain. That investment should be protected but the rights of traders to trade freely should also be protected. There is a delicate balance involved and I want to ensure that everyone affected by potential changes to the current balance are properly consulted and the true ramifications of changes are understood. It should not just be domain holders that are consulted but anyone who would consider a .au domain needs to play a part. If traders are not entering the space then we need to look at why these traders are not entering the space so that we can address the issue.

    Please vote for me as Demand class Director. I promise you that I will listen to you, especially when we disagree, I will ask you your views even when you are quiet and I will represent your views honestly to the Board.

    You can read more about my background here.

    If you have any questions on my where I stand, and what I want to achieve, then feel free to contact me.
     
    DnEbook and DomainNames like this.
  8. DomainNames

    DomainNames Membership: Community

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,000
    Likes Received:
    394
    Are any "supply" candidates posting statements? Their justifications, if they claim any, for another .au extension will be increasing to discuss now the official UK and NZ annual reports have been released showing true uptake and results.
     
    Nicole Murdoch likes this.
  9. Lemon

    Lemon Membership: Trader

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2010
    Messages:
    318
    Likes Received:
    295
    I represent supply.
    I run a business.
    I sell domain names.
    The more I sell the more money I make.
    I want to make as much profit as possible.
    Vote for me
    :)

    ps. I am actually demand class
     
  10. johno69

    johno69 Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,663
    Likes Received:
    422
    auDA Member:
    Yes
    Thanks for posting. It's a shame it's at the 11th hour really.
     
    DomainNames likes this.
  11. Bacon Farmer

    Bacon Farmer Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    888
    Likes Received:
    506
    This > "Ultimately it is a public good and is a critical infrastructure. As such it needs to properly serve the people."

    And the next 3 million registrations (ie foreign owned Ausregistry's profit growth), should not be a factor or influence in any decision regarding direct registrations.
     
    DomainNames likes this.
  12. DomainNames

    DomainNames Membership: Community

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,000
    Likes Received:
    394
    100% correct! What a scam! Amazing... I wonder if anyone received any bonuses or incentives for getting it passed?. They probably should not have "apparently" told people they would or did! Word travels fast.

    Yes Vote rigging and "conflicts of interest" must be stopped for the ...."public good ..,, critical infrastructure. As such it needs to properly serve the people"
     
  13. DnEbook

    DnEbook Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    741
    Thanks to the candidates who posted their views, as for everyone else, what is wrong with you?
     
    DomainNames and Shane like this.
  14. snoopy

    snoopy Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    1,554
    Agree, it is not about increasing the number of "creates" (to use Ausregistry's terminology). Ausregistry is concerned with registration volumes and nothing more.
     
    DomainNames likes this.
  15. snoopy

    snoopy Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    1,554
    Any results as yet?
     
  16. neddy

    neddy Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,649
    Likes Received:
    1,051
    auDA Member:
    Yes
    Congratulations to Tim Connell - elected as Demand Class Director with 52 votes. And congrats to Simon Johnson who was re-elected with 66 votes.

    Hard luck to Shane - came close with 48 votes.
     
  17. snoopy

    snoopy Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    1,554
    Cheers Ned.

    Congrats Tim! Pity Shane didn't get a spot as well.
     
    Scott7, geodomains and neddy like this.
  18. Scott.L

    Scott.L Membership: Trader

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    343
    auDA Member:
    Yes
    Very close - Well Done Tim.
     
  19. Bacon Farmer

    Bacon Farmer Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    888
    Likes Received:
    506
    I look forward to another two years of silence from Simon. Well until he claims credit for creating the internet in his re-election campaign email.
     
    DnEbook, johno69 and snoopy like this.
  20. neddy

    neddy Membership: VIP

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,649
    Likes Received:
    1,051
    auDA Member:
    Yes
    Just to document actual votes in Demand Class:

    John Nugent - 0
    Peter Tonoli - 5
    Chris Burgess - 8
    Teresa Mitchell - 10
    Jim Stewart - 12
    Nicole Murdoch - 16
    Shane Moore - 48
    Tim Connell - 52
    Simon Johnson - 66

    And in Supply Class:

    Angelo Giuffrida - 3
    Joe Manariti - 32
    Erhan Karabardak - 34

    Full article about AGM on Domainer tomorrow.

    Cheers, Ned
     
    Rhythm likes this.