DomainNames
Top Contributor
It seems Crazy Domains are hesitant to meet their advertised Price Guarantee. https://www.crazydomains.com.au/
https://www.crazydomains.com.au/domain-names/
Crazy Domains also have "Strike Through Pricing" worthy of investigation ....
https://newsmediaworks.com.au/accc-...strike-through-pricing-by-froothie-australia/
https://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/misleading-claims-advertising/false-or-misleading-claims
Why isn't auDA looking into .au domain name Consumer complaints such as this like they did under previous auDA management?
https://www.auda.org.au/news/breach-of-registrar-agreement-by-crazy-domains/
The plot thickens...is auDA now more hesitant to look or take action against certain Registrars after signing them up as the voting members and benefiting from their staff votes to retain auDA power?
http://www.domainpulse.com/2018/06/18/auda-stacks-membership-no-accountability/
https://www.dntrade.com.au/threads/branch-stacking.11943/
https://www.itwire.com/strategy/83779-four-domain-vendors-control-70-of-auda-membership-claim.html
http://domainincite.com/23238-two-companies-capture-auda
"Dreamscape ( Crazy Domains) would need support from only one of either Afilias (with 12.4% of members) or the registrar Arq Group (formerly Melbourne IT, with 15%) to obtain a simple majority in any member vote"
https://www.itwire.com/open-sauce/83810-auda-voting-system-is-skewed-to-favour-management.html
https://www.itwire.com/strategy/83945-auda-diregmctor-quits-over-mass-recruitment-of-members.html
https://www.auda.org.au/news/new-board-director-announcement/
"price guarantee We match prices* "
"Australia's cheapest domains"
https://www.crazydomains.com.au/privacy/terms-best-value-promo/"Australia's cheapest domains"
https://www.crazydomains.com.au/domain-names/
Crazy Domains also have "Strike Through Pricing" worthy of investigation ....
https://newsmediaworks.com.au/accc-...strike-through-pricing-by-froothie-australia/
https://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/misleading-claims-advertising/false-or-misleading-claims
Creating a false or misleading impression
Businesses are not allowed to make statements that are incorrect or likely to create a false impression.
This rule applies to their advertising, their product packaging, and any information provided to you by their staff or online shopping services. It also applies to any statements made by businesses in the media or online, such as testimonials on their websites or social media pages.
Businesses are not allowed to make statements that are incorrect or likely to create a false impression.
This rule applies to their advertising, their product packaging, and any information provided to you by their staff or online shopping services. It also applies to any statements made by businesses in the media or online, such as testimonials on their websites or social media pages.
Why isn't auDA looking into .au domain name Consumer complaints such as this like they did under previous auDA management?
https://www.auda.org.au/news/breach-of-registrar-agreement-by-crazy-domains/
The plot thickens...is auDA now more hesitant to look or take action against certain Registrars after signing them up as the voting members and benefiting from their staff votes to retain auDA power?
http://www.domainpulse.com/2018/06/18/auda-stacks-membership-no-accountability/
https://www.dntrade.com.au/threads/branch-stacking.11943/
https://www.itwire.com/strategy/83779-four-domain-vendors-control-70-of-auda-membership-claim.html
http://domainincite.com/23238-two-companies-capture-auda
"Dreamscape ( Crazy Domains) would need support from only one of either Afilias (with 12.4% of members) or the registrar Arq Group (formerly Melbourne IT, with 15%) to obtain a simple majority in any member vote"
https://www.itwire.com/open-sauce/83810-auda-voting-system-is-skewed-to-favour-management.html
https://www.itwire.com/strategy/83945-auda-diregmctor-quits-over-mass-recruitment-of-members.html
https://www.auda.org.au/news/new-board-director-announcement/
Last edited:
