Search results

  1. Scott.L

    Protection of large .com.au portfolio

    Put it to you this way, millions of domain names would be non-compliant if the domain name must match the name of the company. It is simply not financially feasible for auDA to do that because the majority of domain names are not a match to the registrant name. The service you provide using...
  2. Scott.L

    Protection of large .com.au portfolio

    the "match" example is one of many examples to claim eligibility - it's not a catch all example. it is an example of a person registering a domain name under the provision of using their own company name for edibility. "Match" in the example of machinepart4cars is another example of using the...
  3. Scott.L

    Protection of large .com.au portfolio

    No, in this regard, it is a match of the name of a service that the Person provides; machineparts4cars is synonymous with auto wreckers - it is considered to be a match of the service provided.
  4. Scott.L

    Protection of large .com.au portfolio

    a flower shop can register - www. machineparts4cars.com.au and park the page with links to wreckers and the flower shop will not be breaking any rules.
  5. Scott.L

    Protection of large .com.au portfolio

    Ex: Company name is 1234 Pty LTD - registers the domain name: www. dontworry. com.au decides to park that name with links to counselling services the phrase is a synonym for anxiety, which directly relates to the treatment of anxiety. Well. it has nothing to do with the company name and...
  6. Scott.L

    Protection of large .com.au portfolio

    in simple terms - you can register unlimited domain names for the sole purpose of selling those domain names. (I'm sure you can prove that) As eBranding noted in a previous post - Monetisation is no longer an explicit component of eligibility, it's now simply one of many activities that could...
  7. Scott.L

    Protection of large .com.au portfolio

    Look at this way - com.au and net.au namespace 2.4.4 A Person applying for a licence in the com.au and net.au namespaces must be 1. a commercial entity; and 2. the domain name applied for must be: (f) a match or synonym of the name of (i) a service that the Person provides; Unless I've...
  8. Scott.L

    Direct Registrations delayed....

    Especially after seeing the stupendous tangent the PRP went down - even the new rules are wired, for example: why is org, asn, id, not allowed to monetise their domains, and why is leasing a domain only limited to related corporate bodies? It's over complicated nonsense.
  9. Scott.L

    Direct Registrations delayed....

    I see the "workshop" is also held online, so why bother with town hall meetings? Its only going to be a one sided discussion.
  10. Scott.L

    Direct Registrations delayed....

    Direct registrations is like that last slice of cake that everyone wants but no one eats.
  11. Scott.L

    Direct Registrations delayed....

    Yep, give a gorilla thumbs and imagination and look what happens. .
  12. Scott.L

    Direct Registrations delayed....

    And now, auDA back flipped on the No allocation rule, possibly revering back to the old monetization rule or something the PRP regurgitated. LOL.
  13. Scott.L

    Direct Registrations delayed....

    Simplify licensing rules...LOL Millions spent on Bullshit, did you know the CEO Cameron Bordman and the Board all knew what the licensing rules were going to be before the PRP announced their anti-domain investment propaganda. Employing the likes of Hanke and Patton to undermine domain...
  14. Scott.L

    First Leptos, now Boardman

    I doubt auDA is financially set. Damn accounts were pilfered by pirates. I recall last financial year auDA had it's first Loss ($million +) this fun year wouldn't be far from last. What did it achieve, nothing, the old licensing rules are the same as the new with the exception of removing...
  15. Scott.L

    First Leptos, now Boardman

    A good article from David Goldstein http://www.domainpulse.com/2019/08/01/auda-rudderless/
  16. Scott.L

    Aussie company sends flowers to get FutureSuper.com, auDA interviewed.

    " "Laws"? Policy rules at best. So what is deemed "deceptively similar" when a new commercial au namespace is introduced, having an exact matching domain to your own....? Hey, what was that company called again? OK, I got it, now was it .au or .com.au?
  17. Scott.L

    Aussie company sends flowers to get FutureSuper.com, auDA interviewed.

    Fair Dinkum, even the lawyers in this industry are idiots.
  18. Scott.L

    Aussie company sends flowers to get FutureSuper.com, auDA interviewed.

    Did the IP solicitor really say that? What a False and misleading statement?
  19. Scott.L

    Pay.com.au sells $168,000

    Fantastic Sale. It certainly highlights the ever increasing value of the .com.au namespace. You can read the full article here: Pay sells for $168,000
Top