Search results

  1. P

    WHY the 955 must go.

    Thanks for the feedback in this thread - if there are no objections, I'll send it to the CMWG.
  2. P

    WHY the 955 must go.

    Which is why the membership at CMWG forums chose a single membership model. Other models, which as functional constituencies end up being complex, and still have the risk that members may qualify for more than one class.
  3. P

    auDA CMWG - I've applied to join

    In a way, do you really blame them for not wanting to identify themselves? There appears to be a lynch mob baying for their blood. Huh? Am I against domain monetisation? Is it up for discussion again? anti-domainer? So sorry to disappoint you, I'm none of the above. Even if I was...
  4. P

    auDA CMWG - I've applied to join

    Sean: I'm not even 100% sure of who it was, and if it was who I think it was, I don't know their name - they were sitting on the periphery, and I'm not sure they announced their name - we've already had one person (James Deck) wrongly named, I'm not going to perpetuate this by wrongly naming others.
  5. P

    auDA CMWG - I've applied to join

    Hi, just my 2c. I was sitting next to James, for some of the event, and can corroborate that James wasn't the one that used the word 'hoarder'. In terms of directors being at yesterday's event, the CMWG had no objections to inviting directors - it was a public meeting, and James is also an auDA...
  6. P

    Ruxmon Melbourne Meetup

    +1 for RuxMon - some really great talks, and then great opportunities for networking at the pub afterwards.
  7. P

    A New Member Model - Hybrid Model

    Looking at the DENIC member requirements: Any natural or legal person can become a member, if they Administer Internet domains under the Top Level Domain .de Are not affiliated with more than two other DENIC members, unless they are a member of an executive body (i.e. Executive Board or...
  8. P

    A New Member Model - Hybrid Model

    Anything specific that you can point out?
  9. P

    A New Member Model - Hybrid Model

    Hi Scott, As a member of CMWG, I received, and read your very detailed model - you bring up some great suggestions, and your model reminded me of the second option presented at the forum - the drawback of models such as these is the inherent complexity. Agreed entirely - I believe that auDA...
  10. P

    is auDA.org.au abusing it's power?

    No, just 'potential' membership models - by all means - please suggest an alternative, either at the forum, or on the portal.
  11. P

    is auDA.org.au abusing it's power?

    This couldn't be further from the truth. auDA's future success is based on broadening its membership, not reducing that membership. Furthermore, reducing the membership would breach recommendation 11 of the review "That auDA diversify its member base in the short-term with a focus on extending...
  12. P

    Hola

    Hello! I'm Peter Tonoli. I've been using the internet in Australia, since ACSNet. I'm currently on the board of Internet Australia & Electronic Frontiers Australia. Over the past several years I've taken an interest in internet governance in Australia, with the goings on at auDA of particular...
Top