I don't know whether anyone reads "The Domains" blog, but they reported on an interesting trademark decision by WIPO. A lot people seem hot under the collar about it. What implications could this have on our .au market? http://www.thedomains.com/2010/01/31...-of-2010-list/

"What implications could this have on our .au market?"

Wont have any ... http://www.lawsociety.com.au belongs to

THE LAW SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES ...

But the other implications are: if you want to keep domains that are contested you have to defend your supposed rights to the domain in the proper manner and present a defence ... end of story .. as Howard Nue stated .. You snooze, you lose.

I was a bit vague in my statement/question Max. I knew who owned that particular domain here in Australia, but I was just wondering out loud the implications generally. I don't disagree with you, but here was a lot of diverse comment on that blog from seasoned domainers. There since been another decision by WIPO that is equally controversial. Same blog.

If your interested in UDRP decisions then you will find this to be an interesting read the best of the best UDRP lawyers .. missing is John Berryhill esq ..

UDRP Wall of Shame ..

http://udrpwallofshame.com/