DN Trade
Domain Names

Go Back   DN Trade > Community > General Domain Discussion
VentraIP
Register FAQ Members List Domain Registrar Pricing Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31-12-10, 05:25 PM
Australian Adult Australian Adult is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 35
Default Domain Leasing ???

Hi All,
I have enquiries about selling some of my domains..
I have quite a few that i really don't want to part with.
I had a look at the auda website, but couldn't find any rferences to domain leasing .com.au's.
Is it legal ?
Has anyone done this before ?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-12-10, 11:38 PM
Rhythm Rhythm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 559
Default

I think auDA were trying to get feedback in order to create a policy to address this issue.

http://www.auda.org.au/2010npp/2010npp-07102010/

Quote:
c. Issue 1.3 Leasing

Some Panel members noted that there may be legitimate commercial reasons for sub-licensing domain names (eg. IP protection). It was suggested that leasing be allowed as a purpose under the close and substantial connection rule, however it was noted that this would be inconsistent with the prohibition on registering for the sole purpose of sale.

The Panel agreed that this issue be discussed in conjunction with Issue 3.2 on domain monetisation practices, given that the issues are somewhat inter-dependent.

d. Issue 3.2 domain monetisation practices

Panel members noted the difficulties in enforcing the current policy. Some Panel members also expressed the view that the policy is harsh and unfair, with unintended consequences due to the broad and uncertain definition of “monetisation”. It was noted that domain monetisation is a legitimate commercial endeavour and has been an accepted practice in the gTLDs for some time.

It was suggested that domain monetisation can be dealt with under the general policy rules, and there are other safeguards and protections that can be relied on to address bad faith behaviour.

There was general agreement among Panel members that the policy is currently unworkable and should be significantly changed or abolished completely.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-01-11, 11:59 AM
Luke Luke is offline
Verified User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 143
Default

Yup, we can't do it at the moment but it could be introduced in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-01-11, 02:12 PM
DavidL DavidL is offline
Verified User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,966
Default

To be honest I think you'd struggle to find and willing lessees. I've never heard of it happening despite every domain owner keen to do it (inc me)

It's akin to renting out an empty block of land - any tenant would be loathe to put blood sweat and tears into building and marketing a property for someone else.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-11, 10:31 AM
snoopy's Avatar
snoopy snoopy is online now
Verified User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidL View Post
To be honest I think you'd struggle to find and willing lessees. I've never heard of it happening despite every domain owner keen to do it (inc me)

It's akin to renting out an empty block of land - any tenant would be loathe to put blood sweat and tears into building and marketing a property for someone else.
Needs to have type in traffic to work in my view. As you suggest the problem being that nobody is likely to develop a name that they don't have the option to buy. Needs to work both ways.
__________________
Net.au - Trusted by The Goulburn Railway Bowling Club and other leading businesses. Menu now online! Sunday Special: $9.90 MEAL DEAL - STEAK or SCHNITZEL with CHIP & SALAD or VEGETABLES + A FREE OF "BRUER BRIGHT" BEER.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-11, 10:56 AM
WG2010 WG2010 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 355
Default

I know someone that just signed a 15 month ($400 per month) lease agreement with the option for the lessee to purchase the domain at the end of the agreement at no more than a specified price.

I can't get into specific details as I don't have permission but the client liaised with the web dev company which struck the deal with the owner of the domain (it's not a parked one, there is a site built which has rankings).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-11, 05:13 PM
spacey's Avatar
spacey spacey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ElectricGuitars.Net.Au
Posts: 2,181
Default

from memory this is run by a member here

http://www.dnmarket.com.au/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-11, 09:13 PM
Cooper Mills DomainLawyer Cooper Mills DomainLawyer is offline
Verified User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 421
Default

My view is that unless there is an express prohibition (which there currently isn't) you can sub-licence your domain name. auDA may take a different view. I have seen this take place first hand in dozens of situations.

auDA is seeking feedback on this point and many others like Monetisation. Sub Licensing domains is critical to SME business, most savvy business people licence all of their IP (domain names, trademarks, business names etc) to trading entities (for IP protection).

I recommend that everyone provide feedback to the current auDA Names Panel, the issues the panel is looking at are of critical importance to domainers and small business. I strongly recommend that everyone review the discussion paper and send in your views by email - details are here
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-01-11, 01:53 PM
ant's Avatar
ant ant is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 23
Default

I have also heard many instances of people leasing domains to help convince potential buyers. I have also just completed the auDA survey and provided feedback that leasing should be allowed.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-01-11, 03:18 PM
daddybat daddybat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooper Mills DomainLawyer View Post
My view is that unless there is an express prohibition (which there currently isn't) you can sub-licence your domain name. auDA may take a different view. I have seen this take place first hand in dozens of situations.

auDA is seeking feedback on this point and many others like Monetisation. Sub Licensing domains is critical to SME business, most savvy business people licence all of their IP (domain names, trademarks, business names etc) to trading entities (for IP protection).

I recommend that everyone provide feedback to the current auDA Names Panel, the issues the panel is looking at are of critical importance to domainers and small business. I strongly recommend that everyone review the discussion paper and send in your views by email - details are here
Just did the survey. I suggest that you all make your voices heard!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forum SEO by Zoints
Hosted by VentrIP