DN Trade
Domain Names

Go Back   DN Trade > Community > Domain News
VentraIP
Register FAQ Members List Domain Registrar Pricing Rules Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-04-11, 12:29 PM
neddy neddy is offline
Verified User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,328
Default Cities battle over geo domains

Saw this in The Australian today.

What do you think?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/aust...-1226044678166
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-04-11, 12:49 PM
DomainNames DomainNames is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 719
Default

complete waste of taxpayer money

Last edited by DomainNames; 26-04-11 at 12:56 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-04-11, 01:54 PM
James's Avatar
James James is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,208
Default

What is Auda doing???

* Making silly extensions, people are still going to use .com, .com.au and .net they are not really going to move over. Why do cities need this stuff becuase I mean they missed out on Sydney.com.au or something, will then just use the Visit NSW.com.au domain what is wrong with that it is on all branding.
* Back page adverts which i doubt would drive awareness for high prices.
(really need cost effective advertising which can be measured) PPC, Display, CPA models imo..
__________________
Check out my sites: Sydney SEO and Social Media|SEO Australia |Professional SEO |Life Insurance Cover |
Backlinks
For Professional SEO and Social Media Consulting from a well known local consultant, Linkbuilding and more email: contact(at)professionalseo.com.au (Say you are from DNTrade, too be looked after!)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-04-11, 03:39 PM
DomainNames DomainNames is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 719
Default

Adding more australian domain extensions means= domains sold means = more auda revenue.

No matter how pointless the extension is or misinformed buyers are of the new extension

This is why some people are pushing to have another new extension of .au ( instead of .com.au or .net.au or .org.au or .id.au etc )added to Australia . They just want to sell more names but in the end it can stuff up an industry and also confuse users.

What chaos would happen if AUDA ran a generic name auction and released 50,000 new .au names? Sure AUDA would make a lot of money again but it would create chaos. Imagine a release of new namesat an auction like : jobs.au, electricity.au, water.au, travel.au, cars.au, homes.au, realestate.au, rsvp.au, carsales.au, People could be forced to buy the name to protect their existing .com.au at crazy auction prices or face a new direct confusing competitor

The domain extension issue is clear. AUDA please DONT keep adding new domain extensions it creates chaos and confusion for users, businesses etc !

Last edited by DomainNames; 26-04-11 at 03:42 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-04-11, 07:17 PM
spacey's Avatar
spacey spacey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ElectricGuitars.Net.Au
Posts: 2,181
Default

This is a Icann Initiative ........ Not Auda

when you apply, you will be applying to Icann

Perhaps i am incorrect but it is the approved applicant that is running the extension to my knowledge

'ICANN has finalised procedures and protocols for private and public organisations to apply to operate so-called generic TLDs, which could include .food or a brand name as .ebay or .westpac'
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-04-11, 09:47 AM
FirstPageResults's Avatar
FirstPageResults FirstPageResults is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,202
Default

Expert comment:

Quote:
Mr Disspain said....

"At the moment, if you type Melbourne into Google, chances are you will be inundated with a heap of monetised websites that provide you with links to a heap of other monetised websites that then provide links, eventually, to something that might be of use," he said.
When I search 'Melbourne' I get nothing but relevant results.
__________________
Index > Rank > Monetise
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-04-11, 10:19 AM
snoopy's Avatar
snoopy snoopy is offline
Verified User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,223
Default

I would imagine there would be a very limited travel market for extensions such as .sydney and .melbourne, and that is about it. Big waste of money in my view.

It is a wonder the Brisbane city council isn't in on the act as well after their latest bungling.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-04-11, 10:31 AM
Ash Ash is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth
Posts: 680
Default

.syd and .mel would be better for a domain extension but still think either would be a waste.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-04-11, 11:56 AM
Honan's Avatar
Honan Honan is offline
Verified User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neddy View Post
Saw this in The Australian today.

What do you think?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/aust...-1226044678166
Whilst new extensions like .nyc and .berlin will probably do well, .sydney and .melbourne are just a waste of tax payers money
I presume they would have to go to auction, if there is more than one applicant
I believe the loser of an auction loses their $185K
__________________
Joes.com.au
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-04-11, 05:08 PM
DavidL DavidL is offline
Verified User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FirstPageResults View Post
Expert comment:

Quote:
Mr Disspain said....

"At the moment, if you type Melbourne into Google, chances are you will be inundated with a heap of monetised websites that provide you with links to a heap of other monetised websites that then provide links, eventually, to something that might be of use," he said.
When I search 'Melbourne' I get nothing but relevant results.
That's a terrible comment from Mr Disspain... just simply untrue. I think this sort of thing is a symptom of auDA's fear of monetisation. Anyone who was on the latest panel will attest of the real fear from many of the participants that:

a) the web was overrun with spammy monetised sites
b) that Google had no idea how to sort the results so we need more regulation
c) that owners of these monetised sites would deliberately try to place non-relevant ads on these pages

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacey View Post
This is a Icann Initiative ........ Not Auda
Yes this is nothing to do with auDA as far as I know. Not sure why they were quoted really. Ausregistry on the other hand who will be providing management services for many of these new registries have a lot to gain... I have doubts these new extensions will have much success but good luck to them.

As for waste of taxpayers money... who knows. Not a great deal in the scheme of things I guess. Also always happy to see an article on domains names in the mainstream media
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forum SEO by Zoints
Hosted by VentrIP