Quote:
Originally Posted by netfleet
Why?
Do you think auDA was entirely justified in its action? I just find it an incredible coincidence that within hours from when Nick Bolton becomes corporate Australia's favourite target of attack, auDA make this call.
If an unconnected business affair has influenced auDA's decsion in any way, then that's wrong. Whatever the circumstances of either issue...
Here is latest update BTW
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/101116...da-appeal.aspx |
I believe it was just a coincidence - it's not auDA's fault that he was already making headlines for other reasons. auDA has had weeks to arrive at this decision and they had known about the covered up breach for some time.
Who knows, maybe they could've announced it 2 days earlier... it still would've made the papers. The fact is both incidents arose at nearly the same time a few months back.
Shady business practices like covering up security breaches, false claims about PCI compliance etc reflects badly on all registrars.
16-04-09, 04:50 PM
Linear Mode
